More like an application of hyperbole on a generalization of already exaggerated claims (link to one such claim: https://youtu.be/oHk8nn0nw18
) claims for the purpose of a joke and not an argument you autistic pseud.>cry more
I'm not the one who's crying, the kids are (picrel) and it's all because of (You). baka.>has nothing to do with CO2
It was an off hand example of some lame environmental policy that's annoying and ineffective, I could have come up with a better one but I didn't.>wow make oil cheaper so we can burn more and emit EVEN MORE CO2 you're a genius!
So instead of taxing that cheap oil you want to waste our already limited supply transporting more oil? makes sense. I have an even better solution though, why don't we just decrease the demand of oil by organizing ourselves more efficiently? We could embrace the solutions I already outlined thus far and even some I haven't (e.g. reducing or abolishing zoning)>oh just let china take over our shipping that'll really reduce emissions!
China wouldn't dominate our fucking ports, rivers, and canals retard. Besides, this protectionist bullshit doesn't even address the point I was making about climate change.>Green new deal actually has a whole lot of fantastic infrastructure proposals, we mainly just need to tax and tariff the shit out of emissions and the market will self correct practically overnight.
You are retarded. Accumulating a larger national debt and crippling our economy is not a fantastic anything proposal.